<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>energy blog walter :: 2008-2015 postcarbon world :: &#187; condo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energyblog.wordpress.com/category/condo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>at the beginning of an era Beyond Oil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='energyblog.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://energyblog.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="energy blog walter :: 2008-2015 postcarbon world ::" />
		<item>
		<title>Re: Hume:Condo&#8217;s future needs mature debate</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/columnsblogs/article/742003&#8211;hume-condo-s-future-needs-mature-debate
Hume: Condo&#8217;s future needs mature debate
Let me try to shape how such a debate would work from my perspective,
brain dump though it may be.  It might be useful, maybe not.  I&#8217;ll try
not to ramble too much  
First off, what kind of debate?  Not online when thestar doesn&#8217;t have
comments turned on, or with character limits [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=582&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic : Toronto&#8217;s new plan to kill the waterfront</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/real-condo-critic-torontos-new-plan-to-kill-the-waterfront/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/real-condo-critic-torontos-new-plan-to-kill-the-waterfront/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/732899&#8211;famed-architect-unveils-plan-for-queens-quay-jewel
Here is Toronto&#8217;s new proposed Parkside Queen&#8217;s Quay project even though we are billions in debt.  Out of touch are we?   Nothing quite like says kill the waterfront than giant buildings on its edge.  We can&#8217;t recover from Peak Oil and Climate Change at 10, 20, or 40 stories.  No possible.  Try 5 or less.  [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=561&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/real-condo-critic-torontos-new-plan-to-kill-the-waterfront/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://energyblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/new_waterfront1.jpeg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">East Bayfront Parkside Cont.JPG</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: &#8216;Car-free&#8217; condo : Toronto Star Sept 16th 2009</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/re-car-free-condo-toronto-star-sept-16th-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/re-car-free-condo-toronto-star-sept-16th-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Partial blog thread from TheStar article &#8221; &#8216;Car-free&#8217; condo: 42 storeys, no parking&#8221; located here: http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/newsfeatures/article/696394
Here&#8217;s a current outrage to relentless condo development.    The central theme is that we are building condos at any cost and after Peak Oil condos will be useless anyway.  Poor little building, probably the last history on University Ave [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=496&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/re-car-free-condo-toronto-star-sept-16th-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://energyblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/anothercondo.jpeg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">condo cometh!  </media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 38 The Esplanade</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/real-condo-critic-38-the-esplanade/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/real-condo-critic-38-the-esplanade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/realestate/article/693389
Everything we detest in a building, and lots more!
A 3-4 story building is about all you can do for a lot this size, and still make enough local energy for all the businesses and residents (like Bloor/Danforth etc).  But a giant glass building like this one (no different from any other) requires 100% energy inputs [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=485&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/real-condo-critic-38-the-esplanade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: Glas 25 Oxley Street</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/real-condo-critic-glas-25-oxley-street/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/real-condo-critic-glas-25-oxley-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Paradise lost for this?
http://www.thestar.com/article/666936
Yikes&#8230; Fully another really excellent bad example.  Again we have too many people in too little space, means 100% energy inputs mandatory.  Even if you get sunlight in the windows, your condo board will NOT lower your monthly fee, (read the fine print) making any energy you make wholly useless [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=448&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/real-condo-critic-glas-25-oxley-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com/images/5d/28/6b82c69c4dc0824ed3deb4435edc.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Paradise lost for this?</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 650 Lawrence Ave W</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/real-condo-critic-650-lawrence-ave-w/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/real-condo-critic-650-lawrence-ave-w/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
what are we defining here?
http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/663121
To have a tree canopy means defining space.  There is no definition of space here, nothing gentle about the intentions of the trees in this photo.  Only used to block the building view and are called &#8216;nature band-aids&#8217; by Kunstler.
No canopy to protect you from the sun, only shrubs. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=422&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/real-condo-critic-650-lawrence-ave-w/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com/images/a5/77/1eda66b04576be6500d46b41e2bd.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">What are we defining here?</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 233 Carlaw Ave.</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/real-condo-critic-233-carlaw-ave/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/real-condo-critic-233-carlaw-ave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
oh faceless joy
http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/641463
Eight floors is way too much for the energy density available, as five or lower would have saved massive needy energy inputs.  The facade is unwelcoming and there is no definition of stores on the ground.
I see far off to the left some red brick stone front with more character, five floors and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=407&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/real-condo-critic-233-carlaw-ave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com//images/02/01/db06048a4cedb771dc4988fa8b6f.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">oh faceless joy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 7 Gilead Place</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/real-condo-critic-7-gilead-place/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/real-condo-critic-7-gilead-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
garage or jail?  housing without the stores = drab
housinghttp://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/637253
3 stories perfect, but what of this building shows any character or humanity? Why are we celebrating this? They needed the colour windows to make it not look like a rundown garage or jail cell.
The facade for any dweller will get old pretty quickly with them guessing [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=404&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/real-condo-critic-7-gilead-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com//images/39/e9/0bef5a0a4b3eac6322f8ef80ee4f.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">7 Gilead Place</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 383 Ellis Park Rd</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/real-condo-critic-383-ellis-park-rd/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/real-condo-critic-383-ellis-park-rd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 02:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
a part of the community
http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/633971
A model building: Suitable to site and not overwhelming
Can take full advantage of sunlight southern exposure for passive solar, and its integration into the slope gives maximum geothermal potential. Building already capable of generating more energy than it uses to send it back to the grid (net-metering) as a zero emisson [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=399&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/real-condo-critic-383-ellis-park-rd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com//images/ea/1d/2497b6f14411bd3ade8230e25237.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">a part of the community</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 80/88 Charles Street East</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/condo-critic-8088-charles-street-east/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/condo-critic-8088-charles-street-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 05:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The little white fence ain&#8217;t gonna make me feel any better
http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/626549
Missing materials like cheerful brick would have improved the depression-like trance needed to enter this thing every day.
Certainly a building with character, not mindless faceless glass that&#8217;s normally built. But what character? No ground floor entry but a ramp to render the front a joke [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=393&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/condo-critic-8088-charles-street-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com//images/13/0f/0475f29a401f8cc5fdfc9afbf381.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">80/88 Charles Street East</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toronto: 30 to 50 percent local food is possible</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/19/toronto-30-to-50-percent-local-food-is-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/19/toronto-30-to-50-percent-local-food-is-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a presentation on urban agriculture on until April 30th through association with Ryerson University.  Don&#8217;t miss it!
Since this follows the flat roof development recommendations that have been popping up lately, I&#8217;ll definitely be checking this out.
Read More &#8211;&#62; Guelph Mercury: Urban Farming.  Toronto exhibit highlights many ways city dwellers can grow their [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=383&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/19/toronto-30-to-50-percent-local-food-is-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.guelphmercury.topscms.com/images/80/9e/6d8fd5e54442820070f0306f627c.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Toronto Local Food</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 96 St Patrick Street</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/real-condo-critic-96-st-patrick-street/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/real-condo-critic-96-st-patrick-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Another monument to the Age of Waste?
http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/619151
btw the image doesn&#8217;t show (again).  Based on the information listed,
it&#8217;s 12 stories too tall.  If it was shorter it might be able to survive
renovation to electricity as natural gas dwindles.  Otherwise at this
scale the electrical load on the neighbourhood isn&#8217;t worth it to the
city.  [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=351&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/real-condo-critic-96-st-patrick-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com//images/39/e4/d566a2134f86a28049122cdac4e1.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Another monument to the Age of Waste?</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 900 Mt. Pleasant Rd.</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/real-condo-critic-900-mt-pleasant-rd/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/real-condo-critic-900-mt-pleasant-rd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does &#8220;&#8221;"have done their best to bring new levels of density&#8221;"&#8221; mean?
http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/612099
The energy-density persistance in this building has high density versus a low availability of alt-energy. Density 100% of the time just for the sake of it fails understanding and is slightly insane. No trees for zero shade, noise, and pollution control. No stores [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=364&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/real-condo-critic-900-mt-pleasant-rd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Like it or not, condos will keep going up :: Toronto Star Dec 20th, 2008</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/re-like-it-or-not-condos-will-keep-going-up-toronto-star-dec-20-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/re-like-it-or-not-condos-will-keep-going-up-toronto-star-dec-20-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(email to author Christopher Hume)
Hi Mr Hume,
While it&#8217;s true that condos will keep going up, they do so for entirely the wrong reasons that has nothing to do with reality.  This headline and article points to an egregious waste of energy and the fate of Baby Boomers to stick us with their narcissism and never [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=192&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/re-like-it-or-not-condos-will-keep-going-up-toronto-star-dec-20-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Condos (and apartments) Suck</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/why-condos-and-apartments-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/why-condos-and-apartments-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Condos are going to go.  After seeing &#8220;End of Suburbia&#8221; and being well read in the Peak Oil movement over the last four years now, I have serious doubts about this building arrangement.  For me, this is a personal request for any friend to please not move into a condo.   I&#8217;ll [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=123&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/10/why-condos-and-apartments-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>