<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>energy blog walter :: 2008-2015 postcarbon world :: &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energyblog.wordpress.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>at the beginning of an era Beyond Oil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='energyblog.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://energyblog.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="energy blog walter :: 2008-2015 postcarbon world ::" />
		<item>
		<title>Re: Hume:Condo&#8217;s future needs mature debate</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/columnsblogs/article/742003&#8211;hume-condo-s-future-needs-mature-debate
Hume: Condo&#8217;s future needs mature debate
Let me try to shape how such a debate would work from my perspective,
brain dump though it may be.  It might be useful, maybe not.  I&#8217;ll try
not to ramble too much  
First off, what kind of debate?  Not online when thestar doesn&#8217;t have
comments turned on, or with character limits [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=582&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am Jack&#8217;s Climate Change Denier Fight Club Guide</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/i-am-jacks-climate-change-denier-fight-club-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/i-am-jacks-climate-change-denier-fight-club-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fight club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#8217;t Fight Club have a joke about Jack?  We need a Jack Catalogue, a trolling reference for bloggers.  This would be a listing of every cheap shot logical argument online for easy reference.
Why?  Every thread about science today is another Fight Club, full of denial and annoying posts.   I fight that fight and am [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=532&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/i-am-jacks-climate-change-denier-fight-club-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petition: White Roof</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/petition-white-roof/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/petition-white-roof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white roof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made a petition today to support legislation for transitioning to mandatory white rooftops at http://www.petitiononline.com/wroof/petition.html
&#8220;&#8221;"We the undersigned support legislation for transitioning to mandatory white rooftops either painted or by design in order to massively reduce our energy costs by 20-30% throughout the year thereby saving money, reducing energy generation and demands, heat island effects, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=458&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/petition-white-roof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Recession gives Ignatieff a free ride : Toronto Star :: February 15th 2009</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/re-recession-gives-ignatieff-a-free-ride-toronto-star-february-15th-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/re-recession-gives-ignatieff-a-free-ride-toronto-star-february-15th-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ignatieff&#8217;s Liberal&#8217;s moves on the economy would be no better, because the reality is to let the auto industry go into bankruptcy.  That&#8217;s what bankruptcy is for.
In the aftermath of that, we have then the focus to retool ourselves into green tech using all those plants and workers for things we need.  Reality is sometimes [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=290&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/re-recession-gives-ignatieff-a-free-ride-toronto-star-february-15th-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>680news radio not informing public about role of Parlimentary Democracy</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/680newscom-not-informing-public-about-role-of-parlimentary-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/680newscom-not-informing-public-about-role-of-parlimentary-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(As emailed to 680news.com.  680AM radio, &#8220;680news&#8221; is the most popular news radio show in Toronto.  I use it like most people to get up in the morning)
I&#8217;m disappointed to hear 680news misrepresent our own government every 10 minutes.
Concerning the current issue with a possible coalition government: I haven&#8217;t a clue if it&#8217;ll work or [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=161&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/680newscom-not-informing-public-about-role-of-parlimentary-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Showdown looms over &#8216;mean&#8217; Tory blueprint :: Toronto Star Nov 28th 2008</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/re-showdown-looms-over-mean-tory-blueprint-toronto-star-nov-28th-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/re-showdown-looms-over-mean-tory-blueprint-toronto-star-nov-28th-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/545141
Politics is a public domain and as such the whole point of the $1.95 per vote was to eliminate big business and unions from perceptions of controlling political parties (and setup as a knock against Martin).  Only if people vote a lot for a party do they then receive a lot of funding as controlled [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=156&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/re-showdown-looms-over-mean-tory-blueprint-toronto-star-nov-28th-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>