<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>energy blog walter :: 2008-2015 postcarbon world ::</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energyblog.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>at the beginning of an era Beyond Oil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='energyblog.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://energyblog.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="energy blog walter :: 2008-2015 postcarbon world ::" />
		<item>
		<title>Re: Hume:Condo&#8217;s future needs mature debate</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/columnsblogs/article/742003&#8211;hume-condo-s-future-needs-mature-debate
Hume: Condo&#8217;s future needs mature debate
(email to Mr Hume)
Let me try to shape how such a debate would work from my perspective,
brain dump though it may be.  It might be useful, maybe not.  I&#8217;ll try
not to ramble too much  
First off, what kind of debate?  Not online when thestar doesn&#8217;t have
comments turned on, or [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=582&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/re-humecondos-future-needs-mature-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Anti Climate Change Raving Nutter&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/dear-anti-climate-change-raving-nutter/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/dear-anti-climate-change-raving-nutter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRU emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufactured doubt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Anti-Climate Change Raving Nutter;
I&#8217;ve enjoyed these last few weeks in the blogosphere, but let&#8217;s have a time out and consider what&#8217;s going on.
If you didn&#8217;t know already, you&#8217;re being played by the Manufactured Doubt Industry who is now the Anti-Climate Industry.  Apparently this has been going on since 1954 when Big Tobacco fought science [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=571&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/dear-anti-climate-change-raving-nutter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic : Toronto&#8217;s new plan to kill the waterfront</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/real-condo-critic-torontos-new-plan-to-kill-the-waterfront/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/real-condo-critic-torontos-new-plan-to-kill-the-waterfront/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/732899&#8211;famed-architect-unveils-plan-for-queens-quay-jewel
Here is Toronto&#8217;s new proposed Parkside Queen&#8217;s Quay project even though we are billions in debt.  Out of touch are we?   Nothing quite like says kill the waterfront than giant buildings on its edge.  We can&#8217;t recover from Peak Oil and Climate Change at 10, 20, or 40 stories.  No possible.  Try 5 or less.  [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=561&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/real-condo-critic-torontos-new-plan-to-kill-the-waterfront/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://energyblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/new_waterfront1.jpeg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">East Bayfront Parkside Cont.JPG</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryerson University offers first ever Food Security Certificate</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/ryerson-university-offers-first-ever-food-security-certificate/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/ryerson-university-offers-first-ever-food-security-certificate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting what you find out these days.  Seems Ryerson University down the street from me is offering &#8220;&#8230;a post-degree Certificate in Food Security. This cutting-edge program is offered nowhere else in the world, and can be completed entirely through the convenience of distance education.&#8221;
Link here: http://ryerson.ca/ce/foodsecurity
And will cover hunger and poverty, food policy and programs, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=553&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/ryerson-university-offers-first-ever-food-security-certificate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am Jack&#8217;s Climate Change Denier Fight Club Guide</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/i-am-jacks-climate-change-denier-fight-club-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/i-am-jacks-climate-change-denier-fight-club-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fallacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fight club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#8217;t Fight Club have a joke about Jack?  We need a Jack Catalogue, a trolling reference for bloggers.  This would be a listing of every cheap shot logical argument online for easy reference.
Why?  Every thread about science today is another Fight Club, full of denial and annoying posts.   I fight that fight and am [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=532&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/i-am-jacks-climate-change-denier-fight-club-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designing Transit Cities Symposium Reaction</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/designing-transit-cities-symposium-reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/designing-transit-cities-symposium-reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I attended the Designing Transit Cities Symposium presented by the City of Toronto and the Canadian Urban Institute over the last two days, Thur Nov 19 and Fri the 20th.  I&#8217;ll probably talk a lot about this over a while, but I&#8217;ll share some examples for now.
The first day was quite well done, the opening [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=524&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/designing-transit-cities-symposium-reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakville Power plant pollution?</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/oakville-power-plant-pollution/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/oakville-power-plant-pollution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oakvile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerplant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear MOE,
Unfortunately not two words mentioned in your email reply helped
answer my questions.  I&#8217;ve rewritten them below in hopes of a clearer
answer.  As well, I included the OPA representative mentioned in your
post to this email in hopes of a broader opportunity for answers and
perspectives.
Basically in a nutshell consider :
Item:  What are the local or Ontario [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=519&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/oakville-power-plant-pollution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting modified cheese at Metro</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/fighting-modified-cheese-at-metro/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/fighting-modified-cheese-at-metro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[localization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-modified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sent a nice email to Metro over their decision to cut the Equality brand.  I for one am not in favour of every food being modified when I clearly had a choice.  Now that choice is gone.  Feel free to ask Metro why yourself here: http://www.metro.ca/on/utilities/contact.en.html
Hello Metro,
I was wondering what happened to the Equality brand [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=517&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/fighting-modified-cheese-at-metro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Council rejects Don Mills community centre offer</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/council-rejects-don-mills-community-centre-offer/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/council-rejects-don-mills-community-centre-offer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/council-rejects-don-mills-community-centre-offer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While on the surface this is good news, the 17-16 vote means that the OMB will likely approve it along with the 1,387 condo development when the developers go crying to them.
This is crazy!  We&#8217;re not going to solve issues of climate change and peak oil at 12-26 storey buildings developments.  No.  Not even [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=509&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/council-rejects-don-mills-community-centre-offer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: &#8216;Car-free&#8217; condo : Toronto Star Sept 16th 2009</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/re-car-free-condo-toronto-star-sept-16th-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/re-car-free-condo-toronto-star-sept-16th-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Partial blog thread from TheStar article &#8221; &#8216;Car-free&#8217; condo: 42 storeys, no parking&#8221; located here: http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/newsfeatures/article/696394
Here&#8217;s a current outrage to relentless condo development.    The central theme is that we are building condos at any cost and after Peak Oil condos will be useless anyway.  Poor little building, probably the last history on University Ave [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=496&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/re-car-free-condo-toronto-star-sept-16th-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://energyblog.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/anothercondo.jpeg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">condo cometh!  </media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 38 The Esplanade</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/real-condo-critic-38-the-esplanade/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/real-condo-critic-38-the-esplanade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/realestate/article/693389
Everything we detest in a building, and lots more!
A 3-4 story building is about all you can do for a lot this size, and still make enough local energy for all the businesses and residents (like Bloor/Danforth etc).  But a giant glass building like this one (no different from any other) requires 100% energy inputs [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=485&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/real-condo-critic-38-the-esplanade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metrolinx Request For Comments: Electrification</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/metrolinx-request-for-comments-electrification/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/metrolinx-request-for-comments-electrification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrolinx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white roof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post follows the idea that to ask me a question about ideas for energy systems in Ontario is to get an answer from the viewpoint of  Peak Oil.  So when  Metrolinx emailed me for  comments regarding issues comparing electrification versus diesel in  trains and transportation, I of course was happy [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=465&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/metrolinx-request-for-comments-electrification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petition: White Roof</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/petition-white-roof/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/petition-white-roof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white roof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made a petition today to support legislation for transitioning to mandatory white rooftops at http://www.petitiononline.com/wroof/petition.html
&#8220;&#8221;"We the undersigned support legislation for transitioning to mandatory white rooftops either painted or by design in order to massively reduce our energy costs by 20-30% throughout the year thereby saving money, reducing energy generation and demands, heat island effects, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=458&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/petition-white-roof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: Glas 25 Oxley Street</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/real-condo-critic-glas-25-oxley-street/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/real-condo-critic-glas-25-oxley-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Paradise lost for this?
http://www.thestar.com/article/666936
Yikes&#8230; Fully another really excellent bad example.  Again we have too many people in too little space, means 100% energy inputs mandatory.  Even if you get sunlight in the windows, your condo board will NOT lower your monthly fee, (read the fine print) making any energy you make wholly useless [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=448&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/real-condo-critic-glas-25-oxley-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com/images/5d/28/6b82c69c4dc0824ed3deb4435edc.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Paradise lost for this?</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontario Net Metering + White Rooftop = Crazy Savings</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/ontario-net-metering/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/ontario-net-metering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white roof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2006/02/20/ontario-net-metering/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a way that Ontarians can help themselves to energy savings not widely publicized other than the net-metering options available.  I&#8217;ll detail that option more below.
Generally though, Ontarians interested in adding renewables to their home have to take on the brunt of the setup costs.  From Ministry of Energy (Ontario) brochure
&#8220;&#8221;"Electricity consumers in Ontario [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=20&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/ontario-net-metering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontario to offer rebates for hybrid vehicles</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/ontario-to-offer-rebates-for-hybrid-vehicles/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/ontario-to-offer-rebates-for-hybrid-vehicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Ontario to offer rebates for hybrid vehicles
The Toronto Star filters it&#8217;s comments and lately hasn&#8217;t allowed many articles to accept comments.  I made these earlier but now it&#8217;s been taken down.  Here are two comments I made at the time.  One&#8217;s a response to another poster so ignore the train references and the other refers [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=424&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/ontario-to-offer-rebates-for-hybrid-vehicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com/images/9e/19/7044e35a432d9163c839a11f8098.jpeg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 650 Lawrence Ave W</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/real-condo-critic-650-lawrence-ave-w/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/real-condo-critic-650-lawrence-ave-w/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
what are we defining here?
http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/663121
To have a tree canopy means defining space.  There is no definition of space here, nothing gentle about the intentions of the trees in this photo.  Only used to block the building view and are called &#8216;nature band-aids&#8217; by Kunstler.
No canopy to protect you from the sun, only shrubs. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=422&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/real-condo-critic-650-lawrence-ave-w/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com/images/a5/77/1eda66b04576be6500d46b41e2bd.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">What are we defining here?</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signs of Decline: Drivers ignoring market forces</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/signs-of-decline-drivers-ignoring-market-forces/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/signs-of-decline-drivers-ignoring-market-forces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning drivers are upset at $1.03 a litre for gas in Toronto!  Um&#8230; this
isn&#8217;t bad.  If market forces with higher prices are supposed to help investment in alternative transportation and alternatives to cars on gas then we need higher prices so that we make those transitions.  Ask not for a lower price, ask for [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=410&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/signs-of-decline-drivers-ignoring-market-forces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 233 Carlaw Ave.</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/real-condo-critic-233-carlaw-ave/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/real-condo-critic-233-carlaw-ave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
oh faceless joy
http://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/641463
Eight floors is way too much for the energy density available, as five or lower would have saved massive needy energy inputs.  The facade is unwelcoming and there is no definition of stores on the ground.
I see far off to the left some red brick stone front with more character, five floors and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=407&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/30/real-condo-critic-233-carlaw-ave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com//images/02/01/db06048a4cedb771dc4988fa8b6f.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">oh faceless joy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Condo Critic: 7 Gilead Place</title>
		<link>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/real-condo-critic-7-gilead-place/</link>
		<comments>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/real-condo-critic-7-gilead-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>energyblogwalter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[condo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energyblog.wordpress.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
garage or jail?  housing without the stores = drab
housinghttp://www.yourhome.ca/homes/article/637253
3 stories perfect, but what of this building shows any character or humanity? Why are we celebrating this? They needed the colour windows to make it not look like a rundown garage or jail cell.
The facade for any dweller will get old pretty quickly with them guessing [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=energyblog.wordpress.com&blog=86168&post=404&subd=energyblog&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://energyblog.wordpress.com/2009/05/23/real-condo-critic-7-gilead-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bf6b99cee734769953e3a73a6dfaa28c?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">energyblog</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://media.thestar.topscms.com//images/39/e9/0bef5a0a4b3eac6322f8ef80ee4f.jpeg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">7 Gilead Place</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>